Sunday, 18 September 2011


Perbandingan Kosmologi Tamadun Cina dan Tamadun
Iban Berdasarkan Mitos dan Falsafah: Tumpuan kepada
Aspek Hubungan Manusia dengan Alam Semesta

Abstrak
Kertas kerja ini ingin membincangkan hubungan manusia dan alam semesta tamadun
Cina dan tamadun Iban melalui perspektif mitologi dan falsafah. Melalui mitos-mitos
yang ditemurunkan sejak zaman kuno, kita dapat membuat penelitian tentang cara
penduduk tamadun Cina dan Iban menjelaskan kewujudan alam universal, manusia
serta segala fenomena alam semulajadi yang telah berlaku. Mitos-mitos tersebut
walaupun penuh dengan unsur-unsur khayalan dan mistik, tetapi ia dapat memberikan
kita suatu gambaran tentang pandangan asas manusia primitif serta perhubungan dan
kedudukan manusia dengan alam semulajadi. Selepas perbincangan asas kosmologi yang
berdasarkan mitos-mitos tertentu, kertas kerja ini cuba membuat penelitian ringkas ke
atas hubungan manusia dengan alam semesta dalam konteks falsafah, yang juga
merupakan pengalihan kosmologi asas tamadun Cina dan Iban dari peringkat primitif
kepada peringkat yang lebih kompleks dan rasional.

Biodata
Ho Kee Chye,

penyelidik dan pensyarah dari Pusat Pengajian Etnik Malaysia, Kolej New
Era. Beliau memperolehi ijazah Sarjana Sastera (Pengajian Peradaban) , Universiti
Malaya pada tahun 2008 dan Sarjana Muda Sastera (Pengajian Asia Timur), Universiti
Malaya pada tahun 2000. Minat penyelidikan beliau termasuk bidang pengajian
peradaban Asia Timur, pengajian zaman pendudukan Jepun di Malaya dan pengajian
etnik Cina di Malaysia.

Perbandingan Kosmologi Tamadun Cina dan Tamadun
Iban Berdasarkan Mitos dan Falsafah: Tumpuan kepada
Aspek Hubungan Manusia dengan Alam Semesta
 Ho Kee Chye
1. Pendahuluan
Kehidupan manusia tidak dapat terpisah daripada alam semesta, namun cara manusia
memandang dan melayani alam semesta telah melahirkan nilai serta kebudayaan tamadun
masing-masing. Hakikatnya, kosmologi sesebuah tamadun adalah berbeza, dan nilai-nilai
atau ideologi-ideologi ketamadunan yang dipegang oleh tiap-tiap tamadun juga adalah
berlainan. Oleh itu, Kertas kerja ini cuba membincangkan kosmologi tamadun Cina dan
Iban dari dua perspektif, iaitu dari perspektif mitologi dan falsafah, dengan merujuk
kepada hubungan manusia dengan alam semesta kedua-dua tamadun ini.
Setiap tamadun mempunyai mitos masing-masing. Mengikut definisi Kamus Dewan,
mitos ialah cerita zaman dahulu yang dianggap benar, terutamanya yang mengandungi
unsur-unsur konsep atau kepercayaan tentang sejarah awal kewujudan sesuatu suku
bangsa, kejadian-kejadian alam dan sebagainya (2007: 1037).
Mitos merupakan warisan kerohanian yang berharga dari sudut sastera dan budaya.
Kebanyakan mitos ditemurunkan secara naratif dari satu generasi ke generasi yang lain.
Mitos telah memperlihatkan daya kreativiti nenek moyang manusia yang penuh imaginasi,
romatik dan mistik. Walaupun kandungan mitos tidak mudah dipercayai, namun ia telah
memanifestasikan semangat dan pandangan dunia yang paling asas bagi sesebuah bangsa
atau tamadun. Oleh yang demikian, mitos dapat dikatakan melambangkan semangat atau
jiwa sesebuah tamadun dalam usaha mengenali dunia yang mereka tinggal dan
kesungguhan mereka menyelesaikan masalah dunia yang tertimbul. (TaoYang & Zhong
Xiu, 1990: i)

Dalam usahan mengenali dunia, kerangka pemikiran atau sistem kepercayaan yang
asas akan terwujud. Hal sedemikian menunjukkan sesebuah tamadun sedang mengalami
peralihan dari suatu peringkat yang primitif kepada peringkat yang lebih rasional. Ini
adalah kerana kerangka pemikiran atau sistem kepercayaan tersebut akan menggariskan
asas nilai dan estetika indvidu kepada asas masyarakat dan kemajuan sosial.

2. Mitos Tentang Penciptaan Alam Semesta dan Kewujudan Manusia

Tao Yang & Zhong Xiu telah membuat koleksi mitos Cina (lebih daripada 200 buah
cerita) dan membahagikannya kepada 12 kategori yang merangkumi mitos penciptaan
universal, mitos asal usul manusia, mitos wira, mitos raja dan sebagainya. (1990: 6-11)
Koleksi mitos yang serba banyak ini telah menunjukkan kekayaan dan kepelbagaian
tamadun Cina.

kaum Iban berpendapat bahawa mitos merupakan salah satu corak
sastera rakyat atau sastera naratif yang tertua, dan merupakan juga sumber terpenting
dalam kajian tentang kosmologi Iban.
Beberapa buah contoh mitos di Nusantara untuk menunjukkan kosmologi Iban Asli
yang bersifat dualisme.



     Oleh yang demikian, perbincangan selanjutnya akan tertumpu kepada mitos
penciptaan alam semesta atau universal dan mitos kewujudan manusia di tamadun Cina
dan tamadun Iban.



2.1 Penciptaan Alam Semesta / Universal

    Alam semesta, atau dikenali sebagai universal, merupakan suatu bidang yang luas
dan jauh daripada pengetahuan manusia kuno, bahkan manusia kini. Kekurangan
pengetahuan sains dan teknologi mengakibatkan manusia menggunakan ilmu yang sedia
ada dan terhad untuk menjelaskan fenomena atau kejadian alam yang telah berlaku di
sekelilingnya. Untuk memunasabahkan penjelasan mereka, maka peminjaman
unsur-unsur ghaib merupakan satu cara penyelesaian yang paling sesuai. Berikut
merupakan beberapa contoh mitos tamadun Cina dan Iban tentang penciptaan
universal.


(i) Tamadun Cina

Di China, dipercayai bahawa dunia pada asalnya adalah berbentuk telur. Di dalam
telur tersebut hanyalah segala campur-campuran dan kekaburan. Seorang tokoh yang
bernama Pan-gu telah dilahirkan di antaranya. Pan-gu telah memecahkan kerangka telur
mengakibatkan bahagian kerangka atas berkembang menjadi langit dan bahagian
kerangka bawah telah menjadi bumi. Campuran yang terang dan ringan di dalam telur
telah berkembang menjadi udara dan awam, manakala campuran yang berat jatuh ke
bawah menjadi tanah. Pecahan-pecahan kerangka telur yang tercampur dengan campuran
berat bertukar menjadi batu-batuan, manakala pecahan yang tercampur dengan campuran
ringan bertukar menjadi bintang. Dua pecahan kerangkan telur yang besar pula bertukar
menjadi matahari dan bulan. Sejak itu, terwujudnya langit dan bumi, pagi dan malam.
Selepas Pan-gu mati, badannya bertukar menjadi gunung Kunlun dan rohnya menjadi
dewa petir. (TaoYang & Zhong Xiu, 1990:1)
Terdapat juga cerita yang mengatakan bahawa selepas Pan-gu mati, matanya bertukar
menjadi matahari dan bulan; rambut dan jangutnya bertukar menjadi bintang; nafas darimulutnya menjadi angin dan awan; bunyinya menjadi petir, darahnya menjadi sungai dan
sebagainya. Roh dan semangat Pan-gu pula melahirkan manusia serta segala haiwan,
burung dan serangga di dunia. Dengan itu, maka wujudnya dunia sekarang. (TaoYang &
Zhong Xiu, 1990: 8-10)


(ii) Tamadun Iban

  menerusi mitos orang Iban, mereka percaya dunia dan manusia sekarang
adalah dicipta oleh dua ekor burung dewa yang bernama Ara dan Irik. Pada masa dahulu,
berlaku kebanjiran yang besar di alam dunia,dan telah memisahkan kaum iban dari
dunia dewa-dewi,dan melenyapkan kota purba.Ara dan Irik telah mengeluarkan dua bentuk
pepejal telur dari kebanjiran tersebut dan menukarkan mereka kepada langit dan tanah.
Ara dan Irk kemudiannya menciptakan gunung,-ganang, sawah padi, sungai dan tanah
pamah. (Ling Ching Ching, 2005: 117-118)
Selain daripada mitos tersebut di atas, terdapat versi lain yang popular di kalangan
orang Iban.Orang Iban juga percayai bahawa dunia ini dicipta oleh Raja Entala dan
isterinya. Mereka menggunakan kotoran badan mereka untuk menciptakan langit dan
bumi. Disebabkan bumi lebih besar daripada langit, Raja Entala terpaksa memanpatnya
menyesuaikan langit. Akibatnya, wujudlah gunung, bukit, lembah, sungai dan pamah.
Kemudian tertumbuhnya paku pakis, pokok, bunga dan rumput. (Ling Ching Ching, 2005:
118).Dan suku kaum Iban juga mempunyai Al-kitab purba yang tertua di dunia bernama trow.

  Kejadian banjir besar dunia telah menyebabkan kaum Iban telah terpisah dari dunia dewa-dewi.
Menurut pesan dewa-dewi kepada Iban, bahawa dengan cara menyembah atau memuja alam dapat menghubungkan mereka dengan dunia dewa-dewi dan bersatu dengan semangat alam. Upacara tersebut dinamakan miring.


*dunia dewa-dewi kaum iban terbahagi kepada dua iaitu Dunia Panggau Libau ( panggau libau lendat dibiau takang isang , panggau lendat betungkat daun sabang ) dan Gelong ( Gelong batu nakong nyingit nyingong nyimbang nyerabang ) .
*Setelah peristiwa banjir yang menenggelamkan seluruh dunia orang iban telah kehilangan al-kitab purba yang tertua didunia bernama trow.Sebelum itu juga belum ada agama islam,buddha,hindu dan kristian.Sejarah menunjukkan bahawa kaum Iban merupakan kaum yang terawal berhijrah ke Asia Tenggara setelah dihanyutkan oleh banjir besar.


Konsep Taiji
  Dalam tamadun Cina, unsur-unsur dualisme tersebut telah melahirkan konsep Taiji.
Taiji bererti sesuatu yang bersifat universal, dan digunakan untuk menjelaskan perubahan
dunia serta segala kewujudan benda di alam dunia. Taiji adalah prinsip dan displin
kepada semua benda di alam dunia ini, dan selalu berada dalam keadaan bertentangan,iaitu Ying (negatif) dan Yang (positif). Maka segala fenomena dan benda adalah saling
kait mengait dan saling tentang menentang, seperti wujudnya kelahiran tentunya ada
kematian. Ini merupakan tatatertib pengedaran alam semesta. Taiji telah memberi
pengaruhan yang dalam kepda aliran falsafah Konfusianisme dan Daoisme di Cina.
Konsep ìTian Ren He Yiî
Ahli falsafah Cina, Zhang Dainian berpendapat bahawa ìTian Ren He Yiî merupakan
salah satu daripada asas kepada budaya tamadun Cina. (2004: 211-222) Oleh itu, konsep
penyatuan manusia dengan alam semesta merupakan satu aspek yang amat penting dalam
aliran-aliran falsafah Cina.
Istilah ìTianî di sini merujuk kepada alam semesta, universal, langit, syugar atau
Tuhan. Oleh itu, untuk menyatukan manusia atau diri sendiri dengan alam semesta,
manusia perlu memupuk dirinya sehingga ke suatu tahap tertentu. Atas konsep ini, aliran
Daoisme telah melanjutkan makna ìTian Ren He Yiî kepada sesuatu skop yang lebih luas,
iaitu membincangkan tentang sifat semulajadi manusia. Daoisme berpendapat bahawa
ìTianî adalah sesuatu yang semulajadi, begitu juga dengan ìRenî (manusia):
ìGiven man, and you have Heaven; given Heaven, and you still have Heavenî
(Zhuang zi, 2009a: ìThe Tree on the Mountainî)
ìHeaven, Earth, and I were produced together, and all things and I are oneî
(Zhuang zi, 2009b: ìThe Adjustment of Controversiesî)
Konfusianisme pula merupakan aliran falsafah yang praktikal. Bagi Konfusianisme,
ìTianî merupakan ketinggian etika dan akhlak dalam universal. Oleh itu,
pengikut-pengikut Konfusianisme harus memupuk sifat semulajadi mereka supaya tidak
dipengaruhi oleh pelbagai nafsu. Dengan hanya memerlihara hati / sifat semulajadi,
manusia boleh mencapai ke tahap ìTian Ren He Yiî yang merupakan ukuran ketinggian
nilai akhlak sesebuah tamadun atau individu.


*Penting: perbandinagan kosmologi tamadun Iban ini juga pernah digunakan oleh kaum melayu untuk menunjukan kosmologi kaum mereka , dan kaum melayu mendakwa bahawa kosmologi kaum Iban adalah kosmologi melayu yang asli.( fakta berikut adalah salah,sebab genetik melayu tiada kaitan dengan kaum iban .Kosmologi asal kaum melayu purba tidak pernah diketahui).


Ancestry of the Iban Is Predominantly Southeast Asian: Genetic Evidence from Autosomal, Mitochondrial, and Y Chromosomes

1Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
2Department of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
3Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
4Queensland Centre of Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia
5Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Vincent Macaulay, Editor
University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
Conceived and designed the experiments: TSS JX WSW DJW CDH SW BM LBJ. Performed the experiments: TSS YZ WSW. Analyzed the data: TSS JX DJW CDH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RB EJ PL SW BM LBJ. Wrote the paper: TSS JX WSW DJW CDH LBJ.
Received September 8, 2010; Accepted December 11, 2010.
Humans reached present-day Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) in one of the first major human migrations out of Africa. Population movements in the millennia following this initial settlement are thought to have greatly influenced the genetic makeup of current inhabitants, yet the extent attributed to different events is not clear. Recent studies suggest that south-to-north gene flow largely influenced present-day patterns of genetic variation in Southeast Asian populations and that late Pleistocene and early Holocene migrations from Southeast Asia are responsible for a substantial proportion of ISEA ancestry. Archaeological and linguistic evidence suggests that the ancestors of present-day inhabitants came mainly from north-to-south migrations from Taiwan and throughout ISEA approximately 4,000 years ago. We report a large-scale genetic analysis of human variation in the Iban population from the Malaysian state of Sarawak in northwestern Borneo, located in the center of ISEA. Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers analyzed here suggest that the Iban exhibit greatest genetic similarity to Indonesian and mainland Southeast Asian populations. The most common non-recombining Y (NRY) and mitochondrial (mt) DNA haplogroups present in the Iban are associated with populations of Southeast Asia. We conclude that migrations from Southeast Asia made a large contribution to Iban ancestry, although evidence of potential gene flow from Taiwan is also seen in uniparentally inherited marker data.
Introduction
Many distinct ethnic groups reside within the Malaysian state of Sarawak, reflecting broader patterns of cultural and linguistic diversity observed throughout Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) [1]. It has been suggested that ISE Asian inhabitants descend mainly from individuals who either migrated from Southeast Asia before the Neolithic expansion from Taiwan or, alternatively, descend mainly from these Taiwanese migrants [2][3][4][5]. The Iban, also referred to as Sea Dayaks, are one of the largest indigenous groups in Sarawak today [6]. They are believed to have migrated from the headwaters of the Kapuas River in the central highlands of Borneo and down into the coastal plains of present-day Sarawak in several distinct waves, the first of which took place 16 generations, approximately 400 years, ago. Comprehensive genetic analysis of the Iban will provide insight about the extent to which specific population movements influenced this population and contribute to the current understanding of ISE Asian ancestry.
It is well established that the first people to inhabit ISEA migrated across the prehistoric Sundaland land bridge that connected mainland Southeast Asia to regions as far east as Wallace's Line (Fig. 1). These early human migrations occurred approximately 45,000 to 50,000 years ago [7]. Primitive human fossil remains excavated from Niah Cave, Sarawak, where the Iban reside today, provide evidence of anatomically modern human habitation in this location at least 50,000 ago [8][9].
Figure 1
Map of ISEA and generalized migration patterns.
Another wave of migration from mainland Southeast Asia into ISEA occurred between 12,000 and 6,000 years ago (Fig. 1[10]. During this time, the Sunda shelf was partially flooded by rising sea level, resulting in island formation [11][12][13]. Humans continued to migrate into the newly formed islands during the subsequent millennia, but their genetic contribution to various ISE Asian populations is unclear. One model suggests that most of the present-day ISEA inhabitants are direct descendents of populations that migrated during this time [10][13].
An alternative model suggests the largest ancestral contribution to ISEA populations results from a third and more recent event, which is associated with one of the largest agriculturally-driven migrations in human history: the Neolithic expansion from Taiwan. Some linguists suggest that the inhabitants who first settled in present-day ISEA, indigenous Australo-Melanesian foragers, were largely displaced by a wave of “Mongoloid” Austronesians who migrated into this region approximately 4,000 ago[14][15]. These migrants are thought to have left South China, traveled to Taiwan, and by 4,000 ago, expanded into the Philippines and throughout ISEA and the Pacific[2][4][16][17].
The maternal and paternal genetic lineages present among inhabitants throughout Taiwan, East Asia, and ISEA have been independently studied using either non-recombining Y (NRY) or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymorphism data [10][18],[19][20][21]. MtDNA studies report greater diversity in Southeast Asians compared to populations in northeast Asia regions and suggest a southern origin for present-day northeastern Asians [22][23][24][25][26]. Expanding on this concept, phylogenetic mtDNA studies have been used to associate haplogroups with Southeast Asian population movements into ISEA that were driven by climate change in the later stages of the Last Glacial Maximum [10][13][27]. Several reports of NRY data suggest a similar pattern [18][24][28][29] although influence from northern groups, such as Taiwan, is also apparent in Southeast Asians [30].
Technical advancements now provide the opportunity to address questions about ISEA history by extending beyond mtDNA and NRY analyses to that of multi-locus autosomal DNA. Recent studies of genome-wide SNP data [31] suggest a southern origin of East and Southeast Asian populations. In order to obtain a comprehensive picture of the Iban population, we analyzed marker sets for autosomal, Y, and mitochondrial chromosomes. We use this data to distinguish among various models about the origins of the Iban population of Sarawak and conclude that migrations from mainland Southeast Asia and perhaps Indonesia had the most substantial effect on present-day genetic variation in this population, and the amount of gene flow from Taiwan into ISEA is not as large as some models suggest.
Results and Discussion
Genome-wide autosomal variation
To investigate the genetic structure of the Iban and other East and Southeast Asian populations, we combined overlapping SNPs from three data sets. We genotyped approximately 250,000 genome-wide SNPs in 25 Iban individuals [32] and compared our data with Asians from the HapMap II dataset [33] and a previously published 50K SNP microarray dataset [31]. Our final dataset contains nearly 7,000 SNPs genotyped in more than 950 individuals from 39 East/Southeast Asia populations (Fig. 1Table S1). The populations collectively represent ten different regional groups. Pairwise-population FST values calculated between the Iban and each of the ten groups indicate that the Iban population is genetically most similar to Indonesian, Cambodian, and Thai population samples (Table 1; see Fig. S1 for admixture analysis). A principal components analysis (PCA) illustrates a similar pattern of population differentiation, with the Iban showing affinity to the mainland Southeast Asians from Thailand and also Indonesia (Fig. 2Table 2).
Table 1
Table 1
FST between subpopulations in Southeast Asia.
Figure 2
Principal Components Analysis based on genome-wide SNP genetic distances.
Table 2
Table 2
Sub-population PCA coordinates for Figure 2.
In addition to SNP analyses, we assayed 45 short tandem repeats (STRs) in the Iban, Chinese, Japanese, and a group of Southeast Asians comprised of Cambodian, Vietnamese, and Malaysian individuals as previously described (Table S2[34][35][36]. Patterns of genetic differentiation (RST) based on these data matched those observed among comparable samples using the SNP data. The shortest genetic distance observed is between the Iban and peninsular Southeast Asians (Table S7). The Malaysian and Cambodian populations and the Japanese and Chinese populations exhibit the greatest and least genetic affinity to the Iban, respectively.
These analyses indicate that the Iban are most similar to populations located in mainland Southeast Asia and Indonesia (Table 1Table S7), suggesting that the genetic contribution of Taiwanese populations is minor. These results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that Taiwanese groups nearly replaced the populations indigenous to ISEA during the Neolithic expansion.
NRY chromosome haplogroups
Uniparental marker analyses also indicate a strong genetic influence from mainland Southeast Asia, although there is substantial influence from paternal lineages appears to be associated with northern Asian groups (Table S2Table S3). The NYR haplogroup frequencies in the Iban and their relation to other populations are shown in Fig. 3. PC1 separates the Taiwanese Aborigines, Philippines, Nusa Tenggara, and Moluccas from the Iban, other Southeast Asian populations, and the Chinese populations. The separation between the Iban and an aboriginal Taiwanese group based on PC1 argues against strong Taiwanese influence on the Iban. On PC2, the Iban, Vietnamese, Chinese, Philippines, and Aboriginal Taiwanese cluster separately from the Malaysian, Southern Bornean, and to the greatest extreme, the Nusa Tenggara and Moluccas populations.
Figure 3
NRY chromosome haplogroup frequencies in the Iban in relation to other Asian populations.
Among the 89 Iban males, the NRY O sub-haplogroups (frequency of O2a  =  0.42 and O3  =  0.40) are the most frequent. Haplogroup O2a is found at high frequency throughout Southeast Asia and is common among indigenous, isolated populations such as the Hainan Aborigines located off the mainland coast of Southeast Asia [24]. These results suggest a similar prehistory in the Iban and these Southeast Asian populations. The next most frequent NRY haplogroup is O3, which is distributed throughout East Asia, ISEA, and Oceania, and may represent a substantial contribution from Taiwan [18]. Haplogroups O1, K, C, and F are also present, but at lower frequencies (0.04, 0.08, 0.04, and 0.01, respectively). Haplogroup O1 may reflect the impact of the Out-of-Taiwan migration, although better resolution is necessary to specify Taiwan as the source population. The K, C, and F haplogroups are thought to have originated in Melanesian, Asian, and out-of-Africa migrant populations, respectively. The NRY haplogroup frequencies reflect male-specific gene flow from Southeast Asia, although they do not preclude more recent but less substantial contributions from northern populations such as that of Taiwan.
MtDNA haplotypes
In a PCA of the mtDNA haplogroup frequencies, the Iban and southwestern populations (from Sumatra, Java, Bali, Lombok, Melayu Malay, Thailand, and Orang Asli) are separated from all other populations on PC1 (Fig. 4). PC2 separates the Iban from Philippine, Taiwan, Sulawesi, Ambon, Sumba, and other groups from Borneo.
Figure 4
MtDNA haplogroup frequencies in the Iban in relation to other Asian populations.
A previous study [10] provides age estimates for the mtDNA haplogroups studied here, and these estimates have been correlated with the three major human migrations in ISEA discussed above. We identified sixteen haplogroups associated with each of these categories among 83 Iban individuals (Table S4Table S5). The haplotypes in the Iban samples reflect signatures of indigenous, late-Pleistocene, and Neolithic migrations throughout Asia [10], although age estimates must be interpreted with caution [37].
The most common haplogroup among the Iban is M* (16%), which appears to represent ancient lineages within ISEA [10]. Other observed haplogroups thought to originate >25,000 ago include: R22, found among individuals from ISEA, mainland Southeast Asia, and the Nicobar Islands [38]; R9c, most frequent in the Alor population east of Wallace's line; and M21a, notably most common among the Orang Asli [10]. Haplogroup Z, which is found in China, Mainland SEA, Sumatra, and other populations from Borneo is present at 11.11% in the Iban. These results indicate that various ancient mtDNA haplogroups thought to be associated with the first migrations into ISEA are present in the Iban.
Several lineages are also associated with prehistoric migrations during the Last Glacial Maximum, a second major migration wave, when coastlines within the ISEA region nearly doubled in length and approximately half of Sundaland was covered by water [39][40]. Nearly one-fourth of Iban mtDNA haplogroups may originate from this migration event, supporting the hypothesis that environmental factors, specifically climate change and post-glacial flooding, influenced the demographic history of this population [10][13]. This is largely supported by the second most common haplogroup identified among the Iban, B4a* (13.85%), which dates to the late Pleistocene in ISEA [10]. B4c2 is found at considerable frequency (4.9%) and is considered a “relict” haplogroup, dating to 13,000 ago in ISEA. Two additional low-frequency haplogroups of interest that also fall within this time frame include E1 and E2. These subclades originated at 17,000 ago and 9,500 ago, respectively, and are thought to stem from northeast Sundaland or northwest Wallacea, the present-day Indonesian islands east of Borneo [13]. The remaining haplotypes associated with the late-Pleistocene and early-Holocene migrations include M7b3, found in Taiwan and ISEA, and F1a1a, which is common throughout western and southern ISEA and Thailand and is present among aboriginal groups of the mainland Southeast Asia peninsula [41].
The previously described mtDNA haplogroups associated with the Neolithic Taiwan expansion [2][10] found in our Iban sample include the Y2 (12.35%)and F1a4 (1.23%) lineages. The combined frequency of these haplogroups is less than that associated with migration events that occurred prior to this population movement.
The results presented in this study, which are based on both autosomal and uni-parentally transmitted markers, highlight the unique genetic history of the Iban people of Sarawak. Analyses of autosomal data indicate that the Iban are most similar to mainland Southeast Asian groups and suggest that gene flow from Taiwanese agriculturalists appears to be relatively minor in contrast to that from mainland Southeast Asians and Indonesians. The results of NRY and mtDNA haplogroup analyses complement the autosomal analyses by suggesting less gene flow from the agriculturalist expansion from Taiwan than has been previously claimed for ISEA populations [17]. The majority of mtDNA haplogroups and the greatest proportion of NRY lineages identified in our Iban sample are associated with population movements that occurred prior to this expansion. More NRY haplogroups than mtDNA haplogroups were introduced into this population during the Neolithic expansion, but the proportion of NRY haplogroups attributed to this more recent event is still less than half of the total NRY haplogroups identified. Therefore, it appears that migrations during the Neolithic did not eradicate pre-Neolithic groups. Additional sampling of indigenous ISEA populations like the Iban, in addition to genome-wide and model-based analyses, will help to further clarify the population history of this region.
Data collection
We collected DNA samples for 94 unrelated Iban individuals from Sarawak. Since the Iban is traditionally a preliterate society, with some community elders unable to read or write, informed consent was obtained verbally and recorded on videotape. This procedure was approved by local institutional ethics committees (Sarawak Department of Health; the University of Malaysia, Sarawak; Department of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia) [8],[32][42][43]. We compared autosomal, Y-chromosome, and mtDNA SNP and sequence data to previously reported and publicly available data sets (Table S2). The populations and data sets are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 2.
Autosomal Genotyping and Analyses
We used Affymetrix Nsp1 technology to survey ∼250,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genomes of 25 Iban individuals [32]. Using default parameters for the Birdseed algorithm (version 2), we determined genotypes for all samples and analyzed genotypic data using the Affymetrix Genotyping Console 3.1 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). We compared these data with ∼7,000 overlapping SNPs previously genotyped by the HUGO Pan-Asian SNP Consortium (HUGO) using the Affymetrix 50K Xba platform (Table S1[31]. In order to determine patterns of variation in the genome-wide SNP data, we calculated a population pairwise FST genetic distance and performed principal components analysis (PCA) based on these genetic distances as previously described [32]. SNP heterozygosity for the Iban and other Asian populations is provided in Table S6.
To obtain STR genotypes, we combined PCR amplicons in a multiplex reaction comprised of five to ten markers on the Applied Biosystems 3100 Genetic Analyzer. Genotype calls were based upon fluorescence signal and size per ABI GS500-LIZ size standard. We calculated genetic distance estimates (RST) using STR data for the Iban, Chinese, Japanese, and Southeast Asians with the ARLEQUIN 3.1 software package [44].
Non-recombining Y chromosome (NRY) and mitochondrial (mt) DNA genotyping and analyses
We assayed NRY chromosome haplogroup information using 27 Y-chromosome haplogroup/lineage-defining markers and mtDNA haplogroups using 45 mitochondrial coding region SNPs ascertained in populations from ISEA and surrounding regions[10][45][46][47][48][49] (Table S2). The marker combinations used to determine mtDNA haplogroup/lineages are listed in Table S7. We analyzed PCR amplicons containing NRY and mtDNA haplotype and lineage-defining SNP regions on the Applied Biosystems 3100 using single-base extension SNaPshot chemistry in multiplex reactions of five to eight markers. We supplemented the haplogroup/lineage-defining coding region mtDNA SNPs with hypervariable sequence 1 polymorphisms (HVS1 sequence from position 16,000 to 16,411) obtained with BigDye 3.1 dye-terminator fluorescent sequencing (see Table S8 for estimates of nucleotide diversity).
We compared Iban Y chromosome and mtDNA haplogroup frequencies to Y chromosome haplogroup frequencies from populations in China, Taiwan Chinese, Taiwan Aborigine, Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Java, Southern Borneo, Moluccas, and Nusa Tenggara males (data from [50]) and mtDNA haplogroup frequency data from throughout ISEA [10]. PCA plots constructed using haplogroup frequencies were generated using MatLab (ver. r2008).